
Justice P Velmurugan also directed the accused, M Selvakumar, of Kancheepuram district to pay 50,000 compensation to each of the seven victims rescued in March 2006.
Acting on an appeal filed by R Manjula,
one of the rescued, against the acquittal of Selvakumar by the Kancheepuram
principal sessions court, the HC ordered the Kancheepuram police to immediately
lodge Selvakumar in prison under the Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act of
1976. Manjula was 18 when she was rescued.
On Tuesday, when the appeal was listed for ordering sentence, Selvakumar denied the allegations.
On Tuesday, when the appeal was listed for ordering sentence, Selvakumar denied the allegations.
Activists hope verdict will act as deterrent Selvakumar denied
committing the offence , and said he neither did he live there nor did he own
the mill. Claiming that his wife was diabetic and he had two children to take
care of, he prayed to the court to acquit him or at least factor in the jail
term already undergone. The court rejected his plea. Explaining the order,
Manjula’s counsel David Sunder Singh said, “The court has taken a stand that
the release certificate issued by the RDO itself is crucial evidence to prove
that the family were held under bondage.” Testimony of the victim also
strengthens the case, besides the RDO was also one of the eyewitnesses that
proved the case beyond doubt. “This is the highest sentence awarded by HC in
bonded labour system (abolition) act,” he said.
Manjula and her in-laws had worked for seven years at the mill for taking an advance of around ₹3
After investigation, police filed the
In Tamil Nadu, more than 3,090 bonded
No comments:
Post a Comment